Differences in coping strategies for public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization among adolescents in six countries

Autor(en): Michelle F. Wright, Takuya Yanagida, Anna Sevcikova, Ikuko Aoyama, Lenka Dedkova, Hana Machackova, Zheng Li, Shanmukh Vasant Kamble, Faith Bayraktar, Shruti Sourdi, Li Lei, Chang Shu
Abstrakt: The aim of this study was to examine the role of publicity (private versus public) and medium (face-to-face versus cyber) in adolescents' coping strategies for hypothetical victimization, while also considering culture. Participants were adolescents from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. The study also controlled for adolescents' gender, individualism, and collectivism. Adolescents completed questionnaires on the hypothetical coping strategies that they would use for four scenarios, including public faceto-face victimization, public cyber victimization, private face-to-face victimization, and private cyber victimization. Overall, the findings revealed that adolescents relied more on avoidance, social support, retaliation, helplessness, and ignoring for public and face-to-face forms of victimization than for private and cyber forms of victimization. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies are discussed.
Organisation(en)
Externe Organisation(en): Fachhochschule Oberösterreich, Masaryk University, Shizuoka University, Renmin University of China, University of Virginia, Karnatak University, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)
Journal: International Journal of Developmental Science
Band: 10
Seiten: 43-53
Anzahl der Seiten: 11
ISSN: 2192-001X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-150179
Publikationsdatum: 05-2016
Peer-reviewed: Ja
ÖFOS 2012: 501005 Entwicklungspsychologie
Schlagwörter
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Ageing, Life-span and Life-course Studies, Developmental Neuroscience
Link zum Portal: https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/de/publications/4b22075a-1ebb-4c4e-ba34-17f946c4d8fa